How Florida’s “Open and Obvious” Doctrine Affects Slip and Fall Cases

Florida’s “open and obvious” doctrine is an important concept in slip and fall cases. It addresses situations where a hazard is considered easily noticeable or avoidable, which can influence how property owners and businesses are viewed in terms of responsibility.

Understanding this doctrine can help explain why some cases are more challenging than others — and why the specific details of each situation matter.

What Does “Open and Obvious” Mean?

A hazard is considered “open and obvious” when the average person would recognize it upon ordinary observation. Examples might include a large, visible object blocking a walkway or a clearly marked step-down.

Why Does It Matter?

If a hazard is open and obvious, the law may presume that the person who encountered it should have noticed and avoided it. However, that does not always end the analysis. Businesses still have a responsibility to maintain reasonably safe premises.

How It May Affect Slip and Fall Claims

The doctrine can influence a claim in several ways. It may factor into Florida’s comparative negligence rules. It can shape how evidence is evaluated, especially regarding warnings, lighting, or distractions.

Why Every Case Is Different

Even if a hazard appears obvious after the fact, conditions at the time—lighting, crowding, signage, obstructions, or distractions—can change how visible it really was. Each case involves a unique combination of factors that determine how this doctrine may apply.

You don’t have to sort through these issues alone. Contact The Law Office of Maria R. Alaimo for a free consultation and speak with a team dedicated to helping injured individuals understand their options.